cross goss!

lukewarm crossword takes by skep and sorbier

My old frenemy

Ha, Skep, I never considered that running this blog with you could turn crosswording into a PvP game where I insert red herrings into my posts. I would never do that!

Last post's crossword was fun and fresh, delighting me with such sophisticated answers as ASS. Today's post is... not that. Having resubscribed to the New York Times crossword, I am now remembering how staid and frustrating these puzzles can be... A real hard 180 from the AVCX offerings.

Yes, the AVCX puzzles are easier than their NYT counterparts, but they're also so much less stuffy and moustache-twirling. They demand no knowledge of random sports, European literature, or old-timey celebrity trivia. In short, they target an audience that's decades younger.

Anyway, in the spirit of positivity (as though I didn't just gripe at length about the NYT puzzles), let's get into the one NYT crossword that I've done this week that I enjoyed.

NYT, (Friday) May 22 by Gene Louise De Vera

As I've written elsewhere, and will probably come up again and again, my favourite day of the NYT is Friday. This week's Friday puzzle was fun!

Some answer highlights:

I'm realising that, since I don't pull out the terrible old-fashioned fill, it's hard to see why these phrases are notable. But trust me, they really are amid what you usually get in the NYT.

This puzzle also had some answers that I got pretty easily but seemed niche; if I weren't the exact type of person that I am, they would be hard to get, I think:

Since I resubscribed to the NYT games this week, I have gone back through the archives and completed almost all of the May puzzles; and what it taught me is that I have a love-hate opinion of the NYT crossword, now that I've seen how much better puzzles could be with the AVCX. Is the NYT a toxic relationship I need to drop? Sound off in the comments.